P.E.A.C.E. Eludes Our Landlord

It is with a heavy heart that we share the outcome of Tuesday night’s joint meeting between City Council and the Cleveland Heights - University Heights Library. The Library has officially announced their decision to close and “mothball” the Coventry P.E.A.C.E. Building.

While Cleveland Heights City Council members and a representative from University Heights approached the meeting with open minds, ready to invest both time and money into a solution that could benefit all parties involved, the Library remained firmly unmoved. Their unwillingness to compromise was a stark contrast to the collaborative spirit shown by the cities' leaders. We are deeply grateful for the leadership of both cities, who demonstrated their commitment to the community and worked hard to find a way forward. We’ll share more information soon, but in the meantime, we encourage everyone to watch the meeting here: https://youtu.be/aR6vOH-YOBE?si=Q-N3EML1Ik1VVE9T.

Library & City Council Scheduled to Meet

We’re excited to share what we hope is positive news—Cleveland Heights City Council and the Library have agreed to a joint public meeting! This is a crucial opportunity to push forward our mission of saving the Coventry P.E.A.C.E. building and establishing it as a permanent home for arts, culture, and education. The meeting will take place on Tuesday, October 8th at 6:00 pm at Cleveland Heights City Hall.

For those who have been following the journey, despite the Library’s recent vote to reject our P.E.A.C.E. proposal, we remain focused on our Keep the P.E.A.C.E. campaign. Your ongoing support has been the key to our progress—from social media engagement to public pressure, it’s clear that the people of Cleveland Heights and beyond are rallying behind this effort.

Why this matters: The community support we’ve received has been phenomenal. The more we engage people in conversation and share our story, the stronger our movement becomes. Your role in this effort is invaluable, whether it's through sharing posts, writing letters, putting up yard signs or showing up to public meetings.

Since we don’t have the ability to vote for Library Board members—the decision-makers holding the fate of our building—our best strategy is to demonstrate widespread community support and encourage thoughtful decision-making. Your involvement in these next steps is vital.

While the Library's vote to reject the Coventry P.E.A.C.E. proposal was disappointing, it seems like a repeat of last spring’s resolution. Despite this, we remain committed to finding a path forward to establish the Coventry P.E.A.C.E. Building as a permanent home for arts, culture, and education. We are not done yet!

What has been especially challenging is that, despite the involvement of many experienced professionals, including city leaders, the Library trustees have not been open to new ideas or potential paths forward. Their conversation has remained fixed on the belief that this effort is destined to fail, without considering what success could look like. At one point, a trustee asked, “Do you know how much it takes just to take out your garbage?”—a remark that shows a lack of awareness of our professional capacity and failure to review the financial forecast we provided, which clearly lists these costs. For reference, waste removal for the P.E.A.C.E. Building costs about $85 per month.

It’s frustrating to encounter this kind of dialogue when we’ve repeatedly demonstrated our ability to manage the building and understand its financial needs. The emphasis on taxpayer responsibility, while important, is often presented as though we, and our supporters, are not taxpayers ourselves. Additionally, referring to all of us as "artists" or "creatives" overlooks the fact that many of us are professionals in other fields, in addition to our creative roles.

While some of the points we’ve shared below may seem repetitive, it’s important to continue sharing this information because, like the Library Board, many may not have fully understood these critical details. We won’t dwell on every exchange, but several significant points were raised at the recent meeting that need to be addressed. Please read on for more about the Library’s board meeting this past Monday and the key points we felt were important to convey.

READ THE TRANSCRIPT HERE.

IMPORTANT POINTS

Continued Collaboration with City Officials

We continue to actively collaborate with city officials and have secured significant support from Cleveland Heights City Council members and the Mayor of University Heights. Mayor Brennan has offered creative solutions and the allocation of City staff time to help devise a long-term plan—if the Library is willing to come to the table.

The commitment from both cities emphasizes how important the P.E.A.C.E. Building is, not just to those who use it, but to the wider community. This collaboration shows that the issue is important to the vitality of the Cities the Library is mandated to serve. Coventry P.E.A.C.E. and the cities are working together to preserve an essential hub that brings together residents, nonprofits, and businesses.

Coventry P.E.A.C.E.’s Proven Sustainability

Coventry P.E.A.C.E. has a track record of sustainable management. In our short term as master-lease holder and operator, we generated a $40,000 surplus, demonstrating both financial responsibility and a commitment to long-term sustainability. We also contributed to capital projects like the HVAC system, showing that we can effectively manage and maintain the building’s infrastructure.

Our current financial forecasts show that the project will continue to operate better than break-even, ensuring stability. We have a detailed plan in place to immediately increase occupancy by expanding the footprints of existing tenants who have growing needs. Additionally, our marketing plan is designed to recruit new tenants from our extensive network of nonprofits and community organizations, ensuring that the building remains vibrant and fully utilized.

Our approach has always been to look for cost-effective, sustainable solutions—like the detailed HVAC repair plans we received from Comfort Systems. These estimates are significantly lower than the Library’s higher-cost proposals, proving that maintaining the building can be done affordably without compromising on quality.

The Importance of the P.E.A.C.E. Building to the Community

We reject the Library’s claim that our efforts stem from nostalgia. We are committed to preventing harm to the organizations, businesses, and residents that depend on the P.E.A.C.E. Building. Dispersing the nonprofits will weaken the business district and deprive residents of critical programs and services. The collective impact of having these services under one roof is significant, and scattering these organizations would disrupt the cross-pollination of resources and programming that strengthens the entire community.

The Library’s desire for exclusive control over the building’s fate feels inflexible, especially when there is overwhelming support from the public and elected officials for a shared solution that benefits everyone.

Financial Barriers and Moving Goalposts

Despite City Council’s willingness to offer financial help, the Library Board continues to insist that all funds to cover their current estimates must be secured upfront. Yet, they have not clearly defined what an “adequate” amount would be—the only numbers they have stated publicly are all over the board, and based on previous experience, would require further scrutiny to determine their accuracy. This is reminiscent of the 2021 rejection of our 99-year lease proposal, where an undefined financial gap was cited, even though internal records show they had set a target that we exceeded.

We bring this up not to dredge up old grievances but to highlight the recurring pattern of moving goalposts and vague expectations. The result seems to be designed to achieve a specific outcome—removing the nonprofits and likely demolishing the building—rather than addressing the real issues in a transparent and collaborative way. This strategy, combined with misleading information, has created an impenetrable barrier to finding common ground.

What’s Different This Time

What’s different this time is the increased support from both Cleveland Heights and University Heights, as well as the detailed planning and data that have been accumulated. City leaders, well-versed in effective economic development strategies, have publicly stated their support for Coventry P.E.A.C.E. and are willing to contribute both financially and through staff resources to help develop a sustainable path forward. These same people are attempting to guide Library Board members on the best approach in which to move forward, but it is yet to be determined if what is different this time is the fact that those board members will listen and learn from these professionals.

We also now have clear, historical data proving that Coventry P.E.A.C.E.’s financial projections were accurate. Meanwhile, the Library’s own management of the building has led to deficits, further demonstrating the challenge they face in maintaining it. Our ability to operate the building during difficult times, including during the COVID-19 pandemic, only underscores our readiness to take on ownership.

The difference is that Coventry P.E.A.C.E. is committed solely to preserving the building as a nonprofit hub, while the Library has broader missions and simply doesn’t have the time or resources to properly manage this unique facility in the dedicated way that Coventry P.E.A.C.E. will.

The Financial Impact on Taxpayers

Transferring the building to Coventry P.E.A.C.E. would free the taxpayers of the burden of any potential ongoing unrecouped costs. The Library has already approved another $20,000 facility study (the third or fourth one since 2018) and is considering using what very well may be nearly a million more dollars of taxpayer funds for demolition and rebuilding—raising the costs of the park project to around $4 million. This financial burden falls directly on taxpayers and serves no benefit to the broader community when there is a clear and cost-effective alternative: retaining the P.E.A.C.E. Building as the nonprofit hub that it currently is.

Additionally, if the Library allows the building to empty except for the three new tenants, they will be operating the building through the end of 2025 at an even larger deficit. Without the rent from the nine affected tenants subsidizing their costs of ownership, the financial burden on the Library—and, by extension, taxpayers—will continue to grow. This lack of rental income will only compound their operational costs, leading to further losses that could have been avoided by retaining the full complement of nonprofit tenants under Coventry P.E.A.C.E.’s management.

The Ethical Responsibility

Beyond financial considerations, there is an ethical responsibility that the Library Board should not ignore. The expressed wishes of the residents and city leadership in both Cleveland Heights and University Heights overwhelmingly favor retaining the P.E.A.C.E. Building as the nonprofit hub that it currently is. Dispersing the nonprofits would not only damage their missions but also weaken the business district, disrupting the cross-pollination of resources and programming that thrives in a co-located space, and throughout the business district. Ignoring this widespread support could erode public trust and damage the Library’s relationship with its community, which is based on transparency, accountability, and public service.

It is ethically sound for the Library to act in alignment with the community’s desires, ensuring that the P.E.A.C.E. Building remains a vital cultural and educational hub. The public has clearly spoken. As much as the Library would like to maintain the narrative that they can only consider the financial side of this issue, this is not just about money; it’s about upholding the values of the community—the intangibles that create the vibrancy residents seek for their overall well-being and fulfillment in life—a value we, as residents and taxpayers, have always loved and respected about our Library system. It’s about preserving a space that supports multiple nonprofits, provides essential services to the community, and serves as a safe, welcoming space that brings together diverse populations in our communities for unique, shared experiences in a way that an expanded meadow or forest just cannot do. The Library’s mission, rooted in public service, should reflect the best interests of the broader community.

We understand that some may have ethical concerns about transferring the building in its current state, but we are entering this process with our eyes wide open. Coventry P.E.A.C.E. has had the building thoroughly assessed by multiple vendors and engineers, and we are fully aware of its condition, prepared to take ownership as-is. The only ethical concern would arise if the Library were withholding information or over-dramatizing potential issues to influence an outcome that isn’t aligned with public interest.

Running Out the Clock

Together, we can continue to work toward a collaborative solution that ensures the preservation of this beloved community asset, but the Library’s strategy to run out the clock is working. Their latest decision clearly shows no near-term resolution and undermines their argument for not extending our leases to avoid further financial losses.

In fact, to uphold their “fiduciary duty,” they should immediately offer one-year extensions that align with the three new tenants whose leases run through 2025. Without this, the costs of operating the building and paying for expensive outside management will fall almost entirely on taxpayers. Extending the leases of the nine affected tenants provides stability for the organizations to continue serving those who rely on their services, ensures rental income to offset Library costs, and gives everyone more time to work toward a solution that benefits all.

We’ve repeatedly warned that our nine organizations are running out of time to make decisions about relocating. That window is nearly shut, and we are now down to days, not weeks.

We will continue conversations to seek a resolution for as long as we can. Your letters and discussions with key stakeholders remain crucial and are greatly appreciated. Please continue to share ideas and help connect us with potential advisors as we move forward.

Thank you for continuing to stand with us—together, we may still Keep the P.E.A.C.E.

THE LIBRARY BOARD HAS MADE ITS DECISION.

After spending much of the evening on park-related cost changes, the Library Board voted unanimously to reject our proposal for the Coventry P.E.A.C.E. Building. Not only did they turn it down, but they also voted to reject any proposals to purchase the property, which one must assume includes those from the City, as well. Despite our proposal being the only viable option currently presented to prevent demolition, the Board has now effectively closed the door on saving the building. With no other publicly discussed alternative besides demolition and their repeated statements that the property cannot be used for residential or commercial development, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that their minds are already made up. It seems they are simply going through the motions to appease the public, giving the appearance of exploring other options in good faith.

This outcome is deeply disappointing. While we will provide more details soon, it's important to acknowledge the frustration we all feel at this moment.

We want to extend our sincere thanks to everyone who attended, urging the Library not to take this path. Special thanks go to Cleveland Heights City Council members Tony Cuda, Jim Petras, and Gail Larson, as well as University Heights Mayor Michael Brennan, all of whom attended the meeting. Council President Cuda once again emphasized the critical role of the arts in our community, while Mayor Brennan, following up on his letter earlier in the day, called for the Library to collaborate with both Cities to find a solution. Although these pleas fell on deaf ears, it was vital for the Library to hear directly from their elected officials.

While further discussions with City leaders are expected in the coming days, time is running out. The Library Board is clearly running out the clock, and without a breakthrough soon, the home of the arts in a city that prides itself on being 'Home To The Arts' could soon be lost.

Thank you for your continued support, and we will provide you with more details soon and keep you updated as the situation unfolds.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE LIBRARY'S RESOLUTION TO REJECT THE COVENTRY P.E.A.C.E. PROPOSAL.

NOTE (09/26): We have edited the first sentence of this entry from it's original version for clarity. It could have been seen as implying that there was an over-all increase to the park project budget. Some elements of the project saw increased costs over what was budgeted, so other elements were decreased to balance the spending. According to Library Director Nancy Levin, the over-all budget has not changed.

This is a critical moment!

This is good news!

On Monday, September 16, City Council will vote on a resolution of support for the Keep the P.E.A.C.E. effort!

There’s no guarantee the resolution will pass, so we need your support. Now, more than ever, we need you to show up at Council on Monday and show your support. Let’s fill the room and use the public comments portion to commend Council members for recognizing the value of nonprofits like ours and amplifying the voices of residents who support a permanent arts, culture, and education hub.

If you’re a Cleveland Heights resident, this is your chance to tell Council this issue matters to you. If you're from outside the area, share how Coventry P.E.A.C.E. brings you to Cleveland Heights. Thank them for their efforts to save the home of the arts in the City that proudly calls itself 'Home to the Arts.'

We hope to see you Monday night at 7:30 pm at Cleveland Heights City Hall –
40 Severance Circle, Cleveland Heights, OH 44118.

FULL DETAILS

Join us in thanking City Council members for their support and commending them for publicly expressing it.

Many of you responded to the Library’s survey about the future of the Coventry P.E.A.C.E. Building, and over a hundred of you attended the Public Listening Session to show your love for the Library and voice your desire to keep our arts, culture, and education hub.

Unfortunately, after the Library’s Committee meeting on September 9, it appears your voices were not heard by the Library’s leadership (see update below). However, your elected representatives on City Council did hear you. This Monday, September 16, City Council will vote on a resolution of support for the Keep the P.E.A.C.E. effort!

On September 3, our Keep the P.E.A.C.E. Committee spoke with City Council members during their Committee of the Whole session. We emphasized the strong public backing for preserving the Coventry P.E.A.C.E. Building, as reflected in the Library’s survey and residents' comments at the Public Listening Session. (Download a copy of our handout).

We presented a plan that requires no taxpayer dollars, involving a property transfer with easements that preserve the building for our hub while allowing the Library to retain park space. Our financial forecasts show that regular operations would be sustainable and capital expenses covered through grants, foundations, private donors, revenue reserves, and, if necessary, loans. When Coventry P.E.A.C.E. managed the building during COVID, we ended with a $40,000 surplus, compared to the Library’s $40,000 deficit in 2023 under their management.

We were joined by Matt Moore, Executive Director of the Coventry Special Improvement District, who highlighted the fact that our organizations (collectively) are the largest employer in the Coventry District and how our 107 employees, artists, and the families we serve support local businesses, buying meals and goods at nearby shops. He also discussed our strong ties with the business district through events like the upcoming P.E.A.C.E. Pops and Lantern Festival. While greenspace is lovely, it doesn’t contribute to the success of merchants on Coventry Rd.

We posed a key question: Is it better to support a permanent home for arts, culture, and education nonprofits—at no cost to taxpayers—or spend nearly a million taxpayer dollars on demolition? We also expressed concern that if unelected officials move forward with demolishing the P.E.A.C.E. Building against the community’s wishes, it will damage the City’s brand and identity, making ‘Home to the Arts’ an empty slogan.

After the presentation, Councilman Petras suggested a resolution of support, and Councilman Cobb publicly expressed his strong support for Coventry P.E.A.C.E. . (Watch the video here).

In the days that followed, Petras and Cobb co-sponsored a resolution of support, which will be voted on during the Council meeting on Monday, September 16, at 7:30 pm at Cleveland Heights City Hall. While this public statement of support cannot force the Library Board to act and respects their autonomy in decision-making, it sends a clear message that Cleveland Heights' elected representatives stand with the residents who have voiced their desire to preserve this important community pillar. It urges the Library Board to heed this call.

AND THIS IS WHERE YOU COME IN...

There’s no guarantee the resolution will pass, so we need your support. Now, more than ever, we need you to show up at Council on Monday and show your support. Let’s fill the room and use the public comments portion to commend Council members for recognizing the value of nonprofits like ours and amplifying the voices of residents who support a permanent arts, culture, and education hub.

If you’re a Cleveland Heights resident, this is your chance to tell Council this issue matters to you. If you're from outside the area, share how Coventry P.E.A.C.E. brings you to Cleveland Heights. Thank them for their efforts to save the home of the arts in the City that proudly calls itself 'Home to the Arts.'